Puno se priča o cienama nafte i plina. Možda se dio istine nalazi u stalnom sukobu Demokrata i Republikanaca oko iznajmljivanja federalne zemlje i mora naftnim kompanijama za istraživanje i eksploataciju.
Inače već sam na INI dao isti privitak.
Hvala, kolega Sava.
Ovo mi se posebno sviđa:
"If we extrapolate from todays production rates on federal land and
waters, we can estimate that the 68 million acres of leased but currently
inactive federal land and waters could produce an additional 4.8 million
barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day.
That would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural
gas production by 75%. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than a third…"
Hvala, kolega Sava.
Ovo mi se posebno sviđa:
"If we extrapolate from todays production rates on federal land and
waters, we can estimate that the 68 million acres of leased but currently
inactive federal land and waters could produce an additional 4.8 million
barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day.
That would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural
gas production by 75%. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than a third…"
Meni onaj graf gdje se vidi korelacija između cijene benzina i broja bušotina puno govori. 1998. je broj bušotina nadmašio broj dozvola i automatski je došlo do pada cijene benzina. 10.000 ili cca 35%dozvola je neiskorišteno i akumulirano, a cijena nafte raste li raste.
Zanima me da li izjava premijera da će raspravljati o energetici koju je dao u Beču znači odgodu objave o terminalu za kolovoz ili samo misli na nuklearku.U izjavi se ne spominje plin.
Hvala, kolega Sava.
Ovo mi se posebno sviđa:
"If we extrapolate from todays production rates on federal land and
waters, we can estimate that the 68 million acres of leased but currently
inactive federal land and waters could produce an additional 4.8 million
barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day.
That would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural
gas production by 75%. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than a third…"
Ono što je još interesantno u cieloj priči je da su Ameri od 2000. do 2007. povećali potrošnju nafte samo za cca 50 milijuna barela ili ispod 1%!!! Rast stanovništva i rast GDP od cca 20% u tom periodu a rast potrošnje nafte od 1%. Šta se tu događa; kakve to tehnologije uvode da su postali tako efikasni.
Točno po očekivanju, cijelo tržište je u startu zaronilo, već je počeo odbijanac na većini dionica, na Diokiju par strašljivaca "uletjelo" u zamku, izgledan postepeni oporavak.
Hvala, kolega Sava.
Ovo mi se posebno sviđa:
"If we extrapolate from todays production rates on federal land and
waters, we can estimate that the 68 million acres of leased but currently
inactive federal land and waters could produce an additional 4.8 million
barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day.
That would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural
gas production by 75%. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than a third…"
Ono što je još interesantno u cieloj priči je da su Ameri od 2000. do 2007. povećali potrošnju nafte samo za cca 50 milijuna barela ili ispod 1%!!! Rast stanovništva i rast GDP od cca 20% u tom periodu a rast potrošnje nafte od 1%. Šta se tu događa; kakve to tehnologije uvode da su postali tako efikasni.
[/quote]
udio etanola u gorivu u SAD doseže do 40% , djelomičan odgovor se nalazi i u tom podatku !
udio etanola u gorivu u SAD doseže do 40% , djelomičan odgovor se nalazi i u tom podatku !
Proda se oko 130 milijuna barela etanola. To je podatak iz 2007. i to je cca 2,5%.
ajme, što nas je vjeko pomeo… [embarass]
ne boj se, vjeko, to su samo naše želje puste, nema šanse da diokica više zaroni ispod 500.
osim, nedajbože, ako naši ispadnu ne Euru već u prvom krugu [cool]